[x]close

use comma(,) if mutliple email addresses i.e(friend@domain.com, friend2@domain.com)

No interest in ousting anyone Allison K. Sampité | Sat, Sep 01 2012 12:00 PM

An effort to recall two members of the Sweetwater Union High School District board of directors failed Monday.

Since April, members of community activist group Occupy Sweetwater and other citizens who oppose the leadership of Sweetwater Union High School District board members Arlie Ricasa and Jim Cartmill have collected signatures to oust them from their positions.

They needed to present 18,000 signatures to the  Registrar of Voters on Monday so the measure could be placed on the November ballot.

Gene Chavira, who took the lead on signature gathering, said they fell short by approximately 8,000 signatures.

Chavira said the lack of signatures was because of insufficient manpower and money.

“It’s a lot of work,” he said. “It’s all volunteer and we all have jobs.”

Chavira said they were able to collect approximately $3,000 in donations from citizens, while the rest came out of volunteer pockets.

About 50 people worked to gather signatures, according to Chavira.

“Despite what happened we consider it a success,” he said. “We’ve let the district know that we’re serious. That people are not happy with them. It was a learning experience and we’re going to reassess and maybe turn around and do it again, this time with experience.”

Those behind the recall efforts said their actions were prompted by consistent failure of the board to act in the best interest of students, following a district scandal involving two present and two former board members indicted in January on felony charges by District Attorney Bonnie Dumanis for their alleged involvement in a pay-for-play scheme.
Board member John McCann was later served with a notice of petition for his recall.

The group still has a few weeks to collect enough signatures of people wanting him out of office.

“The response was really good,” Chavira said. “Almost anybody who we had a chance to talk to would sign. Most people signed for all three petitions.”

McCann and Cartmill said the group is being dishonest about the number of signatures they’ve actually collected and maintain there’s no evidence that 10,000 people signed petitions. They estimate that closer to a few hundred signatures were collected.

Cartmill said the lack of signatures shows the majority of the community is in opposition to the recall.

“We live in a republic where representatives are elected by the community to represent them,” he said in an email Tuesday. “The recall is a mechanism to be utilized only as a last resort.”

Cartmill said that while he respects the rights of a small vocal minority with the backing of the teachers union to pursue a recall, the potential millions spent on the effort would be better spent on students and their education.

“The reality is I would like to work with everyone involved in the recall to maximize student achievement instead of cause more divisiveness in the community,” he wrote.

Ricasa issued a statement saying she is not concerned with the recall and will continue her commitment to serve the best interests of the students.

“I also appreciate that so many fair-minded parents with school-age children, community members and voters chose to reject the mean-spirited recall campaign, its backers and their prejudicial innuendos,” she said.

“The focus needs to remain on our kids and their educational needs, not self-serving politics.”

McCann labeled recall efforts against him a “complete sham.”

“A small group of Occupy Sweetwater has been attempting a dishonest power grab by using the recall process,” he said.

“I’ve been leading the efforts to reform and clean up the district… My focus will continue to be 100 percent on our students and their achievements and strengthening our school.”

Rate This Article 0 vote(s)
Average Vote 0/5

eastlaker Says:

Sat, Sep 08 2012 08:37 PM

Actually, McCann is the complete sham. The only thing he has been leading is perhaps the line to the water fountain. If he cared at all for the students, he would have stepped up for what is right long ago—but he is all about creating noise and not about substance, true character and living up to leadership standards that the community believes in. The spin that the sitting board members attempted to put on community action is, of course 180 degrees off, just like the rest of the majority board decisions.


anniej Says:

Fri, Sep 07 2012 07:49 PM

if all is soooooooo well as mccann and cartmill report - perhaps they might explain the no confidence in ed brand letter voted on at the Bond Oversight Committee of Prop O last evening, or the online no confidence petition for dr brand that is widely being circulated.

why does the notification for the special board meeting to be held on monday not clearly define that the meeting is to discuss ed brand being given the permanent position? why was it posted exactly at 6:00 pm? on the night of the first charger game - charges vs raiders. why? i am sure it is all about 'doing whatever they could to dissuade the public from attending'. after all brand does not like facing the public, especially a public that wants him gone.

HOPE TO SEE YOU ALL THERE TO VOICE YOUR OPINIONS.


anniej Says:

Fri, Sep 07 2012 07:42 PM

typical john mccann, all about bait and switch with him. i helped to gather the signatures trust the numbers Mr. Chavira gave. could have been more, but some little man kept calling the grocery stores complaining that he had been accosted by those volunteers. wonder who that little man might have been?

i would very much like for the star news to ask mr mccann and mr cartmill about those campaign contributions from the last election. why did cartmill receive close to 30k from the company managing prop o, why did john mccann take donations from contractors when he vowed he would not, two of those contractors plead guilty in the pay to play case that is set to go to trial in january.

"the majority of the community is in opposition to the recall" hmmmmm hope you have that closet full of salesmans suits - cause you are going to need it when you are voted out of office next time around. the community forget? not on your life, we are like elephants and forget nothing that has to do with our children or our tax dollars.


Sam Says:

Sun, Sep 02 2012 04:38 PM

Oh gosh what planet are you living on Cartmill? I signed that petition and while is saddeds me that more people did not step up. I believe part of it was out of fear that someone at the district would find out. The SUHSD board members and their superintendent are a total desgrece to the southbay. We may have fallen short here but trust me come election time you may find yourself finally out of a job!


Leave Comment
Name
Email

(will not be published)

Comment(s)

The Star-News | 296 3rd Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910 | Phone: 619-427-3000 | Fax: 619-426-6346 | info@thestarnews.com| Site Feedback| Corporate