Does California need stricter gun laws?
| Yes |
67%
|
| No |
33%
|
William Post Says:
Sat, Jul 28 2012 07:22 AMStricter gun laws don't protect people. The laws we have now are sufficient. What we need are mental health evaluations on those purchasing guns. Even with that there are no guarantees. Guns don't kill people, people kill people. Our second amendments rights are desperately trying to be removed in the name of "safety to others" but what the REAL reason is...is to disarm American's so they can not rise up and over throw the government and take our country back.
» Should gay couples be allowed to marry?
- see results» Should Chula Vista legalize medical marijuana dispensaries?
- see results» What should be Chula Vista's top priority?
- see results» How successful will the Chargers be this year?
- see results» Is the local economy getting better?
- see results» Is cheerleading a sport?
- see results» Should city council meetings begin with prayer?
- see results» Should citizens be allowed to openly carry firearms?
- see results» Do you think the county is adequately equipped to handle wildfires?
- see results» Is it acceptable to "walk away" from mortgages that are unaffordable?
- see resultsThe Star-News | 296 3rd Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910 | Phone: 619-427-3000 | Fax: 619-426-6346 | info@thestarnews.com| Site Feedback| Corporate

anniej Says:
Tue, Jul 31 2012 08:40 PMwhile i believe all Americans should be able to arm themselves i definitely question the lack of laws that govern the type of guns that were used in the Colorado massacre. I am speaking of the rapid fire weapon specifically.