? The Star-News | Chula Vista Star News

use comma(,) if mutliple email addresses i.e(friend@domain.com, friend2@domain.com)

Cutting comment time was not a violation Allison K. Sampité | Sat, Aug 18 2012 12:00 PM

An attorney with the Sweetwater Union High School District found no abuse by district board members of its bylaws or the Brown Act after a citizen alleged they illegally shortened and eliminated public comment during two consecutive board meetings.

Prop. O Citizens’ Bond Oversight Committee member Kevin O’Neill wrote a letter to district board members last week citing the instances from its June and July meetings and asked for violations to be cured.

“It is unfortunate that, despite the presence of numerous concerned, active and well-informed citizens at the June and July SUHSD board meetings, their public comments, including my own, were either not heard or wrongly shortened,” O’Neill wrote Aug. 8.

Sweetwater district meetings are often packed with citizens wishing to speak during public comment, historically heard toward the beginning of the meeting.

At the July 23 meeting, public comment was reduced to five speakers at two minutes each and moved to the end of the meeting — a decision made by board President Pearl Quinones without a board vote.

“Moving public comments to the end of the meeting, which tends to occur around 10 p.m., hinders public input by forcing it at a later hour when public and board member attentiveness is waning and many interested citizens have had to leave to tend to their families,” O’Neill stated in the letter.

Board bylaw 9323c states that individual speakers are allowed three minutes to address the board on each agenda or non- agenda item, limiting the total time for public input to 20 minutes.

The district’s attorney Dan Shinoff said that, with board consent, the president could increase or decrease the time allowed for public presentation depending on the topic and number of speakers.

Consent merely requires that a majority of the board not object to limiting the number of speakers, according to Shinoff.

“Consent can come in different ways,” he said. “When it’s not specifically agendized and the president is charged with efficiently running the meeting… Ratification is the failure to object.”

Board member Bertha Lopez spoke in favor of hearing all public comments last month and said it wasn’t the first time she’s defended the public’s right to speak.

“The public are our constituents and they should have the right to be heard; this is the only way they can bring up concerns to the board and they should be respected and given the time,” Lopez said.

Public comment was completely eliminated for the June meeting, which was also adjourned without scheduling a continuation.

Board bylaws state a meeting can be adjourned to a later date but can only be extended once.

“Because the board is entitled to adjourn a meeting … prior to hearing, discussing and/or voting on all items on the agenda … the board was within its right to adjourn the June 2012 meeting without hearing public comment on all agendized/non-agendized items,” Shinoff stated in his response letter to O’Neill.

Shinoff said it is the board’s responsibility to weigh the importance of conducting the public’s business with public comment on non-agendized items.

“The board … has the discretion to determine when it is in the best interest of the district to hear public comment on non-agendized items,” Shinoff stated.

Rate This Article 0 vote(s)
Average Vote 0/5

Gloria Smestad Says:

Wed, Aug 22 2012 07:14 AM

Brand's (and the school board's) attempt to control free speech is another strong indication that he is desperately trying to hide from the growing anger the public rightfully feels when the taxpaying public is insulted and abused. Then, let us bring up all the failings of Brand and the school board when it comes to educational decisions. One might say make a picture postcard for arrogance and ill-informed decision-making, and that would be charitable. If this bunch calls themselves educators, it must be in some surreal sense, or maybe 1984-style (Orwell's book, in case anyone still remembers) "Newspeak" in which the lies become "the truth".

Truth does exist, but Ed Brand and crew seem to be completely unfamiliar with it.

I hope they become reaquainted soon, for their own good.

Fran Brinkman Says:

Sun, Aug 19 2012 08:05 PM

Public comments have been put at the end of every board mtg for a long time,because the Brand is trying to frustrate the people he calls the detractors. At the last board mtg,the upset parents spoke for two each. They were told to choose five peoplee to represent the entire group. At the end of the board mtg.the detractors wer told they could speak for one min. I hope you get it now.

anniej Says:

Sun, Aug 19 2012 03:57 PM

it is important when writing a story that the facts are reported correctly:

- at the july 23 meeting the public comment - at the end of the meeting that was referred to - was reduced to ONE MINUTE, NOT 2 from approx 5-6 community members. the 2 minute public comment you speak of was held mid meeting with approx 5 parents speaking out against the transportation cuts. SEE/LISTEN TO BOARD DOCS FOR CONFIRMATION

what is at issue here is not the placement of the public comment or the limiting of public comment, or the time frame given to public comment - what is at issue is the majority of the board attempting to SQUELCH PUBLIC COMMENT - that is the issue.

that is what the story should be focused on.

pearl quinones is, in my opinion, the absolute WORST president of any board that i have ever seen. she is a KNOW NOTHING, DO NOTHING (unless is benefits her) political hack. and that is putting it mildly.

hopefully once the jury of her peers reads, hears, and see the evidence in HER UPCOMING TRIAL in january she will go back to doing what she does best NOTHING - only then it will be on her dime and not ours.

just my opinion

Leave Comment

(will not be published)


The Star-News | 296 3rd Ave., Chula Vista, CA 91910 | Phone: 619-427-3000 | Fax: 619-426-6346 | info@thestarnews.com| Site Feedback| Corporate